Earthbound Light - Nature Photography from the Pacific Northwest and beyond by Bob Johnson
Home
About
Portfolio
Online Ordering
Contact
Comments
Recent Updates
Support

Photo Tip of the Week
CurrentArchivesSubscribeSearch

Digital File Sizes: Not All Pixels are Created Equal

You have a good scanner that produces files over 20 megapixels in size and a good digital camera that shoots 6 megapixel images. Which gives you the better image? Based solely on the numbers, one would be tempted to guess the scanner, but the numbers only tell part of the story.

Before delving into our opening question, suppose you also have a very cheap digital camera that shoots at only 640 x 480 (that was state of the art not that many years ago if you recall). Open a file from such a cheap camera in Photoshop and upsample it to 6 megapixels so it will be the same size as one of our supposedly "good" images. What will our upsampled file look like? I think you can guess that the file that was not upsampled will contain more detail and clearly be better looking than it. In other words, the upsampled image from the cheap camera will be carying around a lot of excess weight (fat) without added information. Relying solely on pixel count therefore doesn't work — not all pixels are the same.

Now back to our initial comparison between the good scanner and the good digital camera. The film that the scanner image was shot on is made of film grain which, if you magnify the image enough, you can actually see. Scan at high enough resolution and some of what you will be scanning will be a detailed image of what film grain looks like. Interesting perhaps, but not really what we were wanting I'd wager. Digital can also contain useless information in the form of noise, but at reasonable shutter speeds and lower ISO settings, the effect is negligible. Digitally captured images tend to be fairly clean, so most of the information they contain is real information. They have no grain.

The output of a scanner is also a second generation analog copy of the film image. Of course the result is a digital file, but it is an analog process that produces it by focusing a lens on the slide. The digital camera image, on the other hand, is an original, through and through. As anyone who's ever used a Xerox machine knows, there is at least some degree of loss in the process of making a copy.

Comparing digital camera images to scanned images can be an educational exercise indeed. The only comparison that really matters of course is the final result, but based on my experience, things are pretty darned close these days for most uses.

Don't let file size differences fool you. Look at the results instead.


Date posted: July 13, 2003

 

Copyright © 2003 Bob Johnson, Earthbound Light - all rights reserved.
Permanent link for this article
 

Previous tip: A Day at the Beach with Your Camera Return to archives menu Next tip: Caps for Nikon Polarizers
 

Tweet this page       Bookmark and Share       Subscribe on Facebook via NetworkedBlogs       Printer Friendly Version

Machine translation:   Español   |   Deutsch   |   Français   |   Italiano   |   Português


A new photo tip is posted each Sunday, so please check back regularly.


Support Earthbound Light by buying from B&H Photo
  Buy a good book
Click here for book recommendations
Support Earthbound Light
  Or say thanks the easy way with PayPal if you prefer



Home  |  About  |  Portfolio  |  WebStore  |  PhotoTips  |  Contact  |  Comments  |  Updates  |  Support
Nature Photography from the Pacific Northwest and beyond by Bob Johnson


View Cart  |  Store Policies  |  Terms of Use  |  Your Privacy